Appellant contends your demo court’s valuation regarding relationship possessions try certainly erroneous hence the new court mistreated its discretion from inside the awarding attorneys fees to help you respondent. I affirm partly, opposite to some extent, and you will remand for additional conclusions. Issues
Respondent withdrew a maximum of $114,241
Appellant Robert S. Snyder and respondent Deborah D. Snyder married into the 1979. In 1988, the fresh functions purchased HKH Purchase Enterprise (HKH). Whenever received, HKH’s possessions integrated good $1,450,000 mortgage reserve and you will an excellent $130,000 thread reserve; its obligations provided more $3,000,000 for the deferred fees. Brand new Snyders put HKH since the a hanging team to get numerous accommodations, next made use of the hotels’ expidited decline so you’re able to offset HKH’s tax liabilities. Continue reading “Theodore J. Chalupsky, Appellant, versus. Dobbs Temporary Qualities, d/b/a professional Group Team, Inc., Respondent”